Thanks for testing again, Shayne. I think it's pretty common to re-open bugs when necessary, and since you're seeing it too, I would definitely change it. (Probably to 'Triaged'.)
I would change it myself, if Launchpad would let me. As the original reporter, I think you can, and I think that's fine. (In a quick look, bug 631 shows that reporters are authorized to do this. :)
I don't have any clear idea, yet, of whether there's been any regression in the code, since the time it looked fixed to us; that is, if it got really fixed and then broken again. Or whether it was just partially fixed, and took longer to reproduce. Probably the latter.
Thanks for testing again, Shayne. I think it's pretty common to re-open bugs when necessary, and since you're seeing it too, I would definitely change it. (Probably to 'Triaged'.)
I would change it myself, if Launchpad would let me. As the original reporter, I think you can, and I think that's fine. (In a quick look, bug 631 shows that reporters are authorized to do this. :)
I don't have any clear idea, yet, of whether there's been any regression in the code, since the time it looked fixed to us; that is, if it got really fixed and then broken again. Or whether it was just partially fixed, and took longer to reproduce. Probably the latter.