On 05/03/12 00:55, Jorge wrote:
> They explained why they are changing the default behaviour, but they
> don't want to explain why they are removing the dodge windows option.
I have explained at length, many many times, why we want to limit the
number of options. All options have an impact on the rest of the code.
Asking for any option seems to you to be reasonable, because "it has no
cost", but it *does* have a cost, and until you understand that you are
not a reasonable counterpart in a conversation. You'll keep thinking I'm
an alien cannibal, and I'll keep thinking you are unable to understand
the consequences of decisions and requests.
You can help us build something amazing, but to do so you will need to
show spine, guts and discipline. Right now, all you're showing is the
ability to make demands repeatedly.
On 05/03/12 00:55, Jorge wrote:
> They explained why they are changing the default behaviour, but they
> don't want to explain why they are removing the dodge windows option.
I have explained at length, many many times, why we want to limit the
number of options. All options have an impact on the rest of the code.
Asking for any option seems to you to be reasonable, because "it has no
cost", but it *does* have a cost, and until you understand that you are
not a reasonable counterpart in a conversation. You'll keep thinking I'm
an alien cannibal, and I'll keep thinking you are unable to understand
the consequences of decisions and requests.
You can help us build something amazing, but to do so you will need to
show spine, guts and discipline. Right now, all you're showing is the
ability to make demands repeatedly.
Mark