On 08/26/2011 12:49 PM, David Barth wrote:
> Seeking design guidance. There are fair points being raised about the
> opacity level and colour used in the absence of the blur. Considering
> the performance impact of blur on small system, should we consider
> reverting to older values color/opacity values when the blur is switched
> off?
>
> Clearly if a no blur option is offered it can't use a completely or near so transparent lens'. As far as the active& static, both are still subject to the background and or window(s) open when used. A useable no blur option would be a great alternative when the blur's are unsuitable.(personally I think the static blur may be the best default option other than it may cause some user confusion if set over an open window
On 08/26/2011 12:49 PM, David Barth wrote: (personally I think the static blur may be the best default option other than it may cause some user confusion if set over an open window
> Seeking design guidance. There are fair points being raised about the
> opacity level and colour used in the absence of the blur. Considering
> the performance impact of blur on small system, should we consider
> reverting to older values color/opacity values when the blur is switched
> off?
>
> Clearly if a no blur option is offered it can't use a completely or near so transparent lens'. As far as the active& static, both are still subject to the background and or window(s) open when used. A useable no blur option would be a great alternative when the blur's are unsuitable.
>