W dniu 19.11.2014 o 10:47, Pete Woods pisze:
> Michi, the shell doesn't add this - it's done inside the scopes runtime.
> If the shell was responsible, then another client wouldn't see the
> location setting. It seems to be like unity-scopes-api needs to add
> localisation support in order to be able to translate any user-visible
> strings. I guess this is the first one, though?
I totally see the problem with enabling translations for a single string
(though I imagine there could be more in the future?).
Maybe we need to come up with a better approach? I.e. you telling the
shell "this is a setting item for location" and we'll handle the whole
thing on our side then?
W dniu 19.11.2014 o 10:47, Pete Woods pisze:
> Michi, the shell doesn't add this - it's done inside the scopes runtime.
> If the shell was responsible, then another client wouldn't see the
> location setting. It seems to be like unity-scopes-api needs to add
> localisation support in order to be able to translate any user-visible
> strings. I guess this is the first one, though?
I totally see the problem with enabling translations for a single string
(though I imagine there could be more in the future?).
Maybe we need to come up with a better approach? I.e. you telling the
shell "this is a setting item for location" and we'll handle the whole
thing on our side then?