Comment 3 for bug 1737989
Revision history for this message
| James Page (james-page) wrote Re: [MIR] ujson | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
Reading the original inclusion commit:
https:/
being actively maintained is one of the review criteria; I've raised aodh and ceilometer tasks as it would appear that this might not be the case today (things where being actively maintained 2 years ago when ujson was added to global requirements).
Any opinion from the OpenStack telemetry devs? are the performance gains from ujson sufficient to justify using something other than the standard json module?