Comment 3 for bug 825143

In what sense is this bug duplicate? I understand, that it's not clear what package this bug belongs to and marking it duplicate of a ccid bug leaves an impression, that the diagnosis on ccid bug page is correct, which would implicate that the bug does actually belong to udev, which creates an infinite regress, because it's marked duplicate of ccid bug. In this case, shouldn't ccid bug be duplicate of udev bug? Would that be right?

Anyway, somebody with real knowledge of the problem should review the bug.