On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 19:01 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Scott James Remnant [2009-09-08 18:02 -0000]:
> > This surely isn't being used in the initramfs (why would we copy this
> > rule there?)
>
> I thought the problem was that we don't do an udevadm trigger after we
> leave the initramfs, and thus the devices which were already detected
> earlier wouldn't get their rules re-run?
>
> If I misunderstood the problem, and it's solely about the time in
> between leaving the initramfs and mounting /usr, it's fine, of course.
>
No, we do a trigger in the initramfs, and again before /usr is mounted -
we don't do a third trigger *after* /usr is mounted.
So these just need to be in the root filesystem for the "primary"
trigger
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 19:01 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Scott James Remnant [2009-09-08 18:02 -0000]:
> > This surely isn't being used in the initramfs (why would we copy this
> > rule there?)
>
> I thought the problem was that we don't do an udevadm trigger after we
> leave the initramfs, and thus the devices which were already detected
> earlier wouldn't get their rules re-run?
>
> If I misunderstood the problem, and it's solely about the time in
> between leaving the initramfs and mounting /usr, it's fine, of course.
>
No, we do a trigger in the initramfs, and again before /usr is mounted -
we don't do a third trigger *after* /usr is mounted.
So these just need to be in the root filesystem for the "primary"
trigger
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
<email address hidden>