On Jul 12, Mourad De Clerck <email address hidden> wrote:
> Are you sure udev is not just deactivated? I think Marco set it up so
> that udev detects whether or not 2.6.12 is running, and if it's not
> (like in your case 2.6.11) it just stops. Well, that's how I understood
> it at least.
Not when upgrading from earlier 0.060-* versions.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden> 1?Q?No= E8l_K=F6the? = <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:28:38 +0200
From: <email address hidden> (Marco d'Itri)
To: Mourad De Clerck <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>
Cc: =?iso-8859-
Subject: Re: Bug#317333: fixed for me with latest version
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Jul 12, Mourad De Clerck <email address hidden> wrote:
> Are you sure udev is not just deactivated? I think Marco set it up so
> that udev detects whether or not 2.6.12 is running, and if it's not
> (like in your case 2.6.11) it just stops. Well, that's how I understood
> it at least.
Not when upgrading from earlier 0.060-* versions.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
w2OHuP7ERAplBAJ kB+4obIxIk13BC3 LcRfnouEttFsgCg hcr7 pvKhxslo=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC1AvWFGf
Pz1rHQNhDkuuiKA
=QzHf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--C7zPtVaVf+ AK4Oqc- -