On Jan 01, Alban browaeys <email address hidden> wrote:
> devfsd and udev both mount /dev (and create files inside). I am wrong
> telling they overwrite their /dev ?
Yes. No conflict is needed, if udev is installed then devfsd will not be
started (no matter if devfs had been mounted by the kernel or not).
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 18:51:40 +0100
From: <email address hidden> (Marco d'Itri)
To: Alban browaeys <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#288043: udev had to conflict with devfsd
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Jan 01, Alban browaeys <email address hidden> wrote:
> devfsd and udev both mount /dev (and create files inside). I am wrong
> telling they overwrite their /dev ?
Yes. No conflict is needed, if udev is installed then devfsd will not be
started (no matter if devfs had been mounted by the kernel or not).
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
w2OHuP7ERAvXDAJ 9momr2hoBKUnbz7 O4Mw1kuZ787pgCg ktur Gt6uUaxg=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB1uMsFGf
D1+a02zxkjkiEgj
=bz6a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--17pEHd4RhPHOi nZp--