Comment 1 for bug 1240019
Revision history for this message
| Nicolas d'Offay (nicolas-doffay) wrote | #1 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
My original reason for code duplication was due to the fact that QML doesn't allow abstract classes, which would mean that a user of the SDK would be able to utilise the incomplete base class which I feel is a bit problematic.
The only approach which seems to be valid is not including the base class in the qmldir file which it makes it more difficult to include in a project.
Any suggestions on how to document this are appreciated.