Comment 4 for bug 1551700

Revision history for this message
wilfridd (widec1) wrote : Re: [Bug 1551700] Re: [OTA9.1] version number

Hi Jonas,

Thank you for your feedback on this minor issue.
I will have a look on next OTA numbering consistency and do the follow up.

BR

Wil

2016-03-31 17:28 GMT+02:00 Jonas G. Drange <email address hidden>:

> ** Changed in: ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => Low
>
> ** Summary changed:
>
> - [OTA9.1] version number
> + [system-update] version number not consistent between update and about
> -> versions
>
> ** Description changed:
>
> - Hi,
> - I'm currently running OTA-9 on Meizu MX4.
> - When checking for update, I should expect to get OTA-9.1 (available
> since a couple of days), but I get Ubuntu, Version: 10 instead, see file
> attached.
> - Réf: https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-phone/msg18551.html
> -
> - Thank you.
> - Best regards,
> -
> - Wilfrid
> + We should consistently use OTA numbering if it exists.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551700
>
> Title:
> [system-update] version number not consistent between update and about
> -> versions
>
> Status in ubuntu-system-settings package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> We should consistently use OTA numbering if it exists.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-system-settings/+bug/1551700/+subscriptions
>