On 20 September 2016 at 10:17, Matthew Paul Thomas <email address hidden>
wrote:
> That “clicks are going away” may be an argument against showing the
> number of click updates. It is not an argument against showing the
> number of updates ever.
It was an argument against creating a service that gave us a number of
click updates in the background, as opposed to having to visit the panel.
We will show system image and snap updates according to spec.
On 20 September 2016 at 10:17, Matthew Paul Thomas <email address hidden>
wrote:
> That “clicks are going away” may be an argument against showing the
> number of click updates. It is not an argument against showing the
> number of updates ever.
It was an argument against creating a service that gave us a number of
click updates in the background, as opposed to having to visit the panel.
We will show system image and snap updates according to spec.
Not sure what we can do here from a USS POV.