Comment 13 for bug 496301

Thanks Loïc to have a look at those two patches.

IIRC in posix, ";;" is not compulsory if you have only one case (it's just "stopping the current case before the next one). Furthermore http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling doesn't use it.
If you wish, I still can add it, just tell me.

Regarding your questions:
- after discussing yesterday with pitti about it, it's obvious that those files aren't really conffiles. It made little sense to the user to change them and most of users should'nt have done that.
- if sysadmin wants it to be started in a normal GNOME session (or Xfce or <whatever>), I guess we shouldn't remove his/her added .desktop autostart file each time they upgrade netbook-launcher. So, the version comparison is a little over-engineering compared to issues/bugs we can get without it.
- Even though we don't really user to change them, if it's the case, the file is renamed netbook-launcher.desktop.dpkg-new and so, not started at the session logon (I tested it when preparing the patch).

I think it's ready to be sponsored (I susbcribed u-m-s yesterday evening and I can see it, have I done something wrong?), but I can add this optional ';;' if you prefer.

FYI, seb thinks that we could handle it differently in the future (with gconf keys), removing those .desktop file. This first step enable experiencing une session in parallel than a regular desktop session and we'll see if improvement have to be done.