Howdy,
Something like that would seem to be a good idea. But, it was
explained that the names come from the debian names an won't change.
I did discover that Debian no longer supports 386, with 486 being the
lowest chip they compile for. They document this better than Ubuntu.
Good day
On 6/19/11, Lexen <email address hidden> wrote:
> Shouldn't we just rename them 32bit and 64bit respectively? Is there
> something I'm missing?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751018
>
> Title:
> i386 installer CDs are named improperly
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/751018/+subscriptions
>
Howdy,
Something like that would seem to be a good idea. But, it was
explained that the names come from the debian names an won't change.
I did discover that Debian no longer supports 386, with 486 being the
lowest chip they compile for. They document this better than Ubuntu.
Good day
On 6/19/11, Lexen <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 751018 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu- cdimage/ +bug/751018/ +subscriptions
> Shouldn't we just rename them 32bit and 64bit respectively? Is there
> something I'm missing?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> i386 installer CDs are named improperly
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>