Am 10.08.2010 09:44, schrieb Matthew East:
> ordinarily the process is not to update the website until the
> package is updated. In this case given that the PDF file has
> accidentally used the newer version, I would go ahead and update the
> html version too to avoid the inconsistency that Klaus has pointed out.
IMHO the severity of the problem should justify an immediate update of
the package anyway.
Why severe? For several reasons, each one alone should justify a fix:
1: The manual is lagging at least two versions behind the software.
2: The pdf formatting is broken: important config-lines are truncated.
3: Several steps are missing, that are absolutely required to get the
samba server running as domain controller (see the other bug reports for
samba).
Am 10.08.2010 09:44, schrieb Matthew East:
> ordinarily the process is not to update the website until the
> package is updated. In this case given that the PDF file has
> accidentally used the newer version, I would go ahead and update the
> html version too to avoid the inconsistency that Klaus has pointed out.
IMHO the severity of the problem should justify an immediate update of
the package anyway.
Why severe? For several reasons, each one alone should justify a fix:
1: The manual is lagging at least two versions behind the software.
2: The pdf formatting is broken: important config-lines are truncated.
3: Several steps are missing, that are absolutely required to get the
samba server running as domain controller (see the other bug reports for
samba).
Klaus