Artur, that is what I was thinking, but I'm just not sure on the repercussions of doing that, I think Matthew needs to comment. I would try and match the naming convention as closely as possible, and make it a fully unique string of the Ubuntu version.
Example:
<!ENTITY distro-rev-point '8.04.2'>
In the case that it was the same as the distro-rev version since they don't use a ".0" - (let's plan for 10.04), you just set it:
<!ENTITY distro-rev-point '10.04'>
and later becomes
<!ENTITY distro-rev-point '10.04.1'>
and so on.
Artur, that is what I was thinking, but I'm just not sure on the repercussions of doing that, I think Matthew needs to comment. I would try and match the naming convention as closely as possible, and make it a fully unique string of the Ubuntu version.
Example:
<!ENTITY distro-rev-point '8.04.2'>
In the case that it was the same as the distro-rev version since they don't use a ".0" - (let's plan for 10.04), you just set it:
<!ENTITY distro-rev-point '10.04'>
and later becomes
<!ENTITY distro-rev-point '10.04.1'>
and so on.
Then our documentation line becomes: cdimage. ubuntu. com/jeos/ releases/ &distro- rev;/release/ ubuntu- &distro- rev-point; -jeos-i386. iso</command>
<command>wget http://
I hope that makes sense. Let me know what you think and I'll propose a patch.