also i have thought that using the live version offers suported
options suggestios as does the install apllication
such as "removing ubuntu minimal may not allow updates etc"
this will give rise to technical support
confirmation and perhaps eleviate the demand burden for
releasing programs that are not completely supported
for example
you could print something similar to this in your history or map
Requirements for the release of Beryl 0.2.0:
* All major work items resolved
* Zero functional regressions from Beryl 0.1.2
* Zero performance regressions from Beryl 0.1.2
* Zero stability regressions from Beryl 0.1.2
* Fully beta testing of development release
* All bugs marked as blocker resolved
* l10n support of "acceptable" quality
* New user interfaces must conform to GNOME Human Interface Guidelines
also i have thought that using the live version offers suported
options suggestios as does the install apllication
such as "removing ubuntu minimal may not allow updates etc"
this will give rise to technical support
confirmation and perhaps eleviate the demand burden for
releasing programs that are not completely supported
for example
you could print something similar to this in your history or map
Requirements for the release of Beryl 0.2.0:
* All major work items resolved
* Zero functional regressions from Beryl 0.1.2
* Zero performance regressions from Beryl 0.1.2
* Zero stability regressions from Beryl 0.1.2
* Fully beta testing of development release
* All bugs marked as blocker resolved
* l10n support of "acceptable" quality
* New user interfaces must conform to GNOME Human Interface Guidelines
peace =]