Comment 52 for bug 1751252
Revision history for this message
|
|
#52 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
I wonder whether the fix of setting the pool->attached = XNextRequest(dpy)
after the XShmAttach would work. That's effectively delaying the shmdt until after whatever the next X request is after the attach has completed; who knows what that is, but as long as there is one (ahem, that might be a bit of an assumption; could we just add a dummy?) then it should complete. Not got a clue what the perf would be.