I find that whenever a bug report summary contains “should”, it is assuming a particular solution to an often-underspecified problem. Here, if I understand it, the problem is that you can’t use VirtualBox kernel drivers without installing other third-party software. Maybe fixing that requires making it possible to turn off Secure Boot independently, or maybe it doesn’t. Are there other reasons to turn off Secure Boot?
<cyphermox> mpt: this needs more discussion, things aren't so simple as they're described in the bug
Bug 1612450 is probably more urgent, but if this bug was fixed probably it would involve rewriting the solution to that one.
I find that whenever a bug report summary contains “should”, it is assuming a particular solution to an often-underspec ified problem. Here, if I understand it, the problem is that you can’t use VirtualBox kernel drivers without installing other third-party software. Maybe fixing that requires making it possible to turn off Secure Boot independently, or maybe it doesn’t. Are there other reasons to turn off Secure Boot?
<cyphermox> mpt: this needs more discussion, things aren't so simple as they're described in the bug
Bug 1612450 is probably more urgent, but if this bug was fixed probably it would involve rewriting the solution to that one.