ZFS support has been rolled into grub2 on vivid, but not f2fs (yet)
util-linux has supported f2fs for some time (blkid) and filesystem recovery tools (fsck.f2fs) have been around for quite a while.
The performance boost using f2fs over journalling FSes on low end SSDs on low end equipment is phenomenal.
There is a lower limit on solid state storage - f2fs opens several parallel streams to the drive and as such won't work well with low end flash memory cards or USB devices.
That said: There is still a performance boost and memory/CPU load drop over journalling FSes, which is useful on memory-constrained low-end hardware and f2fs is a lower-stress FS for solid-state devices in terms of write levels.
It's also suitable for use on higher end SSDs. I have been using it quite successfully on EVO850s The big advantage over the non-ssd oriented filesystems is that it goes out of its way to try and avoid write amplification.
Oops, no. My bad.
ZFS support has been rolled into grub2 on vivid, but not f2fs (yet)
util-linux has supported f2fs for some time (blkid) and filesystem recovery tools (fsck.f2fs) have been around for quite a while.
The performance boost using f2fs over journalling FSes on low end SSDs on low end equipment is phenomenal.
There is a lower limit on solid state storage - f2fs opens several parallel streams to the drive and as such won't work well with low end flash memory cards or USB devices.
That said: There is still a performance boost and memory/CPU load drop over journalling FSes, which is useful on memory-constrained low-end hardware and f2fs is a lower-stress FS for solid-state devices in terms of write levels.
It's also suitable for use on higher end SSDs. I have been using it quite successfully on EVO850s The big advantage over the non-ssd oriented filesystems is that it goes out of its way to try and avoid write amplification.