The patch generated by debdiff is against u-boot-xlnx (2020.2-0ubuntu11). The debdiff command seems to generate a bad patch because of symlinks.
The new patch was generate by the git command "git format-patch -1 --full-index --binary".
Source codes from pull-lp-source is different from [1]. pull-lp-source has some files like .pc which [1] doesn't have. So, I uploaded two patches (comment#4 & #5). One is based on pull-lp-source while another one is based on [2].
When I apply the patch by "patch" command, some *.dat and *.hex are missing. But, the patch can be applied correctly by git command. So, I created a git repo[2] for reference.
@Dave
The patch generated by debdiff is against u-boot-xlnx (2020.2-0ubuntu11). The debdiff command seems to generate a bad patch because of symlinks.
The new patch was generate by the git command "git format-patch -1 --full-index --binary".
Source codes from pull-lp-source is different from [1]. pull-lp-source has some files like .pc which [1] doesn't have. So, I uploaded two patches (comment#4 & #5). One is based on pull-lp-source while another one is based on [2].
When I apply the patch by "patch" command, some *.dat and *.hex are missing. But, the patch can be applied correctly by git command. So, I created a git repo[2] for reference.
u-boot-xlnx[2] lunar-2022. 1_update3 pull-lp- source- 2020.2- 0ubuntu11 pull-lp- source- 2022.1_ update3
├──branch:lunar
├──branch:
├──branch:
└──branch:
lunar means the source code comes from [1]
--- /code.launchpad .net/~git- ubuntu- import/ ubuntu/ +source/ u-boot- xlnx/+git/ u-boot- xlnx/+ref/ ubuntu/ lunar /code.launchpad .net/~ethan. hsieh/+ git/u-boot- xlnx 3-0ubuntu1) , https:/ /launchpad. net/~ethan. hsieh/+ archive/ ubuntu/ sru-test/ +packages
[1] https:/
[2] https:/
[3] test package: u-boot-xlnx (2022.1-