<email address hidden> wrote:
>> then I guess you want to look at this
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/tree/conf.d/README
>>
>
> And then? can you talk more? how does it explain why growing the range of the
> numbering for the priority order is a Fedora matter?
>
> You understand Fedora's priority thing is based on that right?
>
the first one is what suggested in fontconfig, and the second
one is what suggested in Fedora. see the difference?
the limitation that non-latin shall not go below 65 is
only a Fedora limitation. As long as you match lang tag as
the enclosing block in your config file, I don't think it
matters which number you choose for Latin or non-latin
fonts if 50<n<65.
<rant start>
Following rules is fine, but do not turn it into dogmatism.
Rules are meant to help, not meant to hinder.
</rant end>
<email address hidden> wrote: cgit.freedeskto p.org/fontconfi g/tree/ conf.d/ README
>> then I guess you want to look at this
>> http://
>>
>
> And then? can you talk more? how does it explain why growing the range of the
> numbering for the priority order is a Fedora matter?
>
> You understand Fedora's priority thing is based on that right?
>
I should have completed my sentence. What I wanted you to do cgit.freedeskto p.org/fontconfi g/tree/ conf.d/ README git.fedorahoste d.org/git/ fontpackages. git?p=fontpacka ges.git; a=blob; f=fontconfig- templates/ fontconfig- priorities. txt
is to compare
http://
with
http://
the first one is what suggested in fontconfig, and the second
one is what suggested in Fedora. see the difference?
the limitation that non-latin shall not go below 65 is
only a Fedora limitation. As long as you match lang tag as
the enclosing block in your config file, I don't think it
matters which number you choose for Latin or non-latin
fonts if 50<n<65.
<rant start>
Following rules is fine, but do not turn it into dogmatism.
Rules are meant to help, not meant to hinder.
</rant end>