(In reply to comment #91)
> I think it is a bad idea. As I said several times previously, 65-nonlatin.conf
> is not for specific languages. It only provides sufficient font fallback (to
> prevent fontconfig randomly picking up low quality fonts) for rendering CJK
> char under a non-CJK specific environment (such as en_US, fr etc).
If there is proper font config in place we shouldn't need any fallbacks.
> What we need is a BETTER 65-nonlatin, removing from conf.d or adding lang tag
> miss the point completely.
Why is adding lang tag a problem, specially for CJK?
So how to solve https:/ /bugzilla. redhat. com/show_ bug.cgi? id=476459 ?
(In reply to comment #91)
> I think it is a bad idea. As I said several times previously, 65-nonlatin.conf
> is not for specific languages. It only provides sufficient font fallback (to
> prevent fontconfig randomly picking up low quality fonts) for rendering CJK
> char under a non-CJK specific environment (such as en_US, fr etc).
If there is proper font config in place we shouldn't need any fallbacks.
> What we need is a BETTER 65-nonlatin, removing from conf.d or adding lang tag
> miss the point completely.
Why is adding lang tag a problem, specially for CJK?