Comment 4 for bug 310088
Revision history for this message
| Andrea Francia (andrea-francia) wrote Re: [Bug 310088] Re: restore-trash crashes if the original path does not exist (even if it's in the same trash can) | #4 |
Christoph Bloch wrote:
> One more suggestion: Don't name the trash command "trash-file" unless there are absolutely compulsory reasons for it. My arguments against "trash-file":
> * It is not intuitive and therefore unnecessarily difficult to memorise.
> * It is unnecessarily long.
> * Every change in the name of programs causes confusion, so the new solution should be a clear improvement (which it isn't).
> * It is even wrong: Directories can be trashed, too.
>
> Just "trash" was much better.
>
I had a long discussion about that with the fedora people.
The discussion started on:
https:/
And it followed in
https:/
I would prefer "trash" as name but they don't allow me to name it
"trash" because "the name is too generic".