Comment 6 for bug 500153

The point is: My network is using 172.16.3.1 - a debian box - for routing, internet access etc.
But there was also a normal "home router" (at 172.16.3.10) provided by my ISP connected to that debian box to provide wireless access at my home. This "home router" was advertising kinda rogueish, so miniupnc asked this one to do the portforwarding stuff.
What I expected is miniupnc to question whether 172.16.3.10 was truely in charge for port forwarding and discard its UPnP service, because it is not the current router.

This is route -n,
Default output is in german, sorry. But it should be kinda obvious, maybe except for "Routentabelle" (Routing table) and Ziel (Target).

Kernel-IP-Routentabelle
Ziel Router Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
172.16.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 2 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 172.16.3.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0