Okay, I've done the backports. Most of the items in the list are one-liners
that I consider safe, but the primary reason for this work -- backporting the
overdownloading bug -- is (as predicted) a monster 1400 line diff. Who knows
how much QA is needed for that, especially since most of our active testers
have already moved onto 1.41 beta 2. I am very uncomfortable with this and
think that ~ubuntu-sru should be uncomfortable with it too.
As I said above, the overdownloading bug does not actually hit many users.
Sergiy Zuban overstates the case when he says it's "completely unusable".
===
Here are the safe, small low-hanging fruit 1.3x backports that I *do* endorse.
Should I make a separate ticket for this?
Okay, I've done the backports. Most of the items in the list are one-liners
that I consider safe, but the primary reason for this work -- backporting the
overdownloading bug -- is (as predicted) a monster 1400 line diff. Who knows
how much QA is needed for that, especially since most of our active testers
have already moved onto 1.41 beta 2. I am very uncomfortable with this and
think that ~ubuntu-sru should be uncomfortable with it too.
As I said above, the overdownloading bug does not actually hit many users.
Sergiy Zuban overstates the case when he says it's "completely unusable".
===
Here are the safe, small low-hanging fruit 1.3x backports that I *do* endorse.
Should I make a separate ticket for this?
http:// trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7276 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7277 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7278 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7279 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7280 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7281 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7282 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7284 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7285 trac.transmissi onbt.com/ changeset/ 7286
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://
http://