Comment 5 for bug 1888656

Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote : Re: [Bug 1888656] Re: [MIR] tlp

>
> Hi, i'm TLP's upstream/author.
>

Hello,
glad to hear from you which implies that you have an eye on these issues as
well - that is great.

> I do shellchecks for every TLP release (there even is a Makefile target
> for it) but didn't re-check with 20.04 before the 1.3 release. My bad. Feel
> free to make use of my commit:
> [...]

Yes I have seen that none are critical which is why I have put it to the
optional list of things to look at.

[...]

I can say without immodesty that TLP itself breaks very rarely.
>

That is great to hear (well, not for the kernel) but great still for TLP
itself.
Overall you relieve some of my concerns about code complexity with these
statements.
But those were not stopping this process anyway.

Thanks for your feedback linrunner!

@Linrunner - one more question for you - do you also have access to a test
matrix of different HW systems e.g. to test a new release on many different
HW/Kernel combos?
Sounds like overkill in terms of space/power/money requirement, but you
know - in a perfect world - such a thing would exist. Seeing you here I
thought I might ask.

In General, still what is missing here for promotion is a team subscriber,
I'll ask around in todays MIR meeting if one team planned to own it.