Comment 32 for bug 885542

Revision history for this message
In , Bugmail-asutherland (bugmail-asutherland) wrote :

(In reply to Magnus Melin from comment #23)
> Andrew, any idea about this?

I accuse the reverse enumerator of stopping prematurely, skipping the first header in the box, but the quick perusal I did of the code in question was not enough to make it obvious where the glitch is. I would suggest looking into the enumerator more.