(In reply to comment #32)
> Well, thank you Ryan for caring for the users. Please, continue overlooking
> this issue as a minor problem and certainly there will be more cases of data
> loss and even tech newspapers will likely mention it.
DO NOT re-request blocking flags that have already been denied unless significant new information is available about its severity (e.g. a crash that turns out to be exploitable). That a missing feature happens to annoy you personally is not significant. As far as I know, this feature has *never* existed since the Netscape days, so it's apparently not even as big a deal as you think it is.
I wonder if a Eudora-like method is better - detaching attachments and keeping them in the folder on disk that contains the mail account...of course then if you edit the attachment you no longer have the original available.
(In reply to comment #32)
> Well, thank you Ryan for caring for the users. Please, continue overlooking
> this issue as a minor problem and certainly there will be more cases of data
> loss and even tech newspapers will likely mention it.
DO NOT re-request blocking flags that have already been denied unless significant new information is available about its severity (e.g. a crash that turns out to be exploitable). That a missing feature happens to annoy you personally is not significant. As far as I know, this feature has *never* existed since the Netscape days, so it's apparently not even as big a deal as you think it is.
I wonder if a Eudora-like method is better - detaching attachments and keeping them in the folder on disk that contains the mail account...of course then if you edit the attachment you no longer have the original available.