(In reply to comment #67) > > So what's the reason for this? > That code is the reason that the extensions need to hack around the problem of > not getting all headers they need.
But this has to be an extra bug IMHO.
(In reply to comment #67)
> > So what's the reason for this?
> That code is the reason that the extensions need to hack around the problem of
> not getting all headers they need.
But this has to be an extra bug IMHO.