Comment 16 for bug 2060534

Revision history for this message
In , Omry Yadan (omry) wrote :

> It is headed in this direction - work is in progress.

Good to hear.

> I don't foresee us attempting to twiddle old code that is soon to be replaced - cost/benefit - especially considering AV is somehow implicated. Unless there is a clear smoking gun or the code change out gets delayed.

Is the indexer being rewritten as well?
It feels like it hits a bad message and either gets stuck processing it or maybe an error is causing endless retries.
I was hoping to be able to pinpoint the offending msg via verbose logging of the indexer (that hopefully logs details about each msg as it's indexing it) and provide the offending msg to a new bug in the indexer (if the problem is of relevance to other people).