Comment 105 for bug 1945368

Revision history for this message
In , Worcester12345 (worcester12345) wrote :

(In reply to Anje from comment #101)
> (In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #98)
...
> I suggest it is modified and used - if you feel a separate bug is required.
>
> Some work was undertaken regarding the null entry - so it is possible the local.sqlite issue could have been resolved in bug 1729664 but I suppose time will tell if it works.

How much time? I'd say it should be pretty quick to know one way or the other.

"FIXED/WORKSFORME/REOPEN"?