(In reply to Ben Campbell from comment #140)
> It does fit in quite nicely with what I've been looking at with the
> EmptyTrash() implementation, so I'm happy to look at it ...
Thanks. I was in to minds and almost about to cancel the NI since this is going ((too) far) into IMAP. But then on the other hand, we need to increase our backend knowledge of IMAP.
(In reply to Ben Campbell from comment #140)
> It does fit in quite nicely with what I've been looking at with the
> EmptyTrash() implementation, so I'm happy to look at it ...
Thanks. I was in to minds and almost about to cancel the NI since this is going ((too) far) into IMAP. But then on the other hand, we need to increase our backend knowledge of IMAP.