Comment 7 for bug 28104

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:12:34 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Sommer <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#346326: tetex-bin: postinst fails -- dvips35.map not found

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Frank,

Frank K=FCster schrieb am Tue 10. Jan, 10:39 (+0100):
> J=F6rg Sommer <email address hidden> wrote:
>=20
> > Did you ever discuss this issue in debian-devel?
>=20
> Yes, and it's clear that it's not a bug to fail if the local admin
> refuses to update the configuration

It's legal that the package installation fails? Why you don't refuse to
install, e.g. the preinstall script should check and fail or bring a
warning and the postinst should not run the hazardous parts and the admin
must do it by hand (i.e. call dpkg-reconfigure tex-common or update-XY).

Regards, J=F6rg.
--=20
NetBSD ist f=FCr Frauen: es l=E4uft auf Waschmaschinen

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQ8QjQoZ13Cz2nwVYAQJ5Egf/coNwSk3bokkyU2dlsv+dn9wJ2LwtueXq
uznL0wwBoX1rJ5nHFX7KqeWdzvGIp+m8phq9mpBlG/40hVU2Gggdqa0zEQa3QpBF
+03RWWR3LH+ULahYoXlVpBgPx2/6QMfQTwN9LpJ1eNP3rcRbxKAtFaKub9Rsgcyl
wRF+6WaYiUlKfevbanwK8ThfzvwSUo3ZKDaSBWnXLGZ711dVnfFG2Y705LV490ws
M0fhq6nMZ4VSu822rlCH/8pjIb4Ic9MkS3pnGNgetXwiIu/ALQPK4fFemeWPbXJD
8n+cRb6o5Bl3/jzz9oX1dVryzwnpSUY+SFDQXwOP+AXO4Y29wOMEMQ==
=JPde
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dTy3Mrz/UPE2dbVg--