Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi Joey,
>
> Martin Schulze <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> > The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the
> > incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in
> > sid as well.
>
> Did you see Martin Pitt's "enhanced" patch - do both address the same
> problems?
The appendix removes the douplette Martin found, so yes.
> P.S. Did you see my mail to -release regarding the tetex-base upload to
> stable/proposed-updates?
No. Could you forward it?
Regards,
Joey
--
Have you ever noticed that "General Public Licence" contains the word "Pub"?
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi Joey,
>
> Martin Schulze <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> > The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the
> > incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in
> > sid as well.
>
> Did you see Martin Pitt's "enhanced" patch - do both address the same
> problems?
The appendix removes the douplette Martin found, so yes.
> P.S. Did you see my mail to -release regarding the tetex-base upload to proposed- updates?
> stable/
No. Could you forward it?
Regards,
Joey
--
Have you ever noticed that "General Public Licence" contains the word "Pub"?
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.