> After discovering that the same flawed multiplication is also present
> in upstream's other two patches, I decided to completely rework the
> patch.
>
> I attach the debdiff with separated out changelog. Florian, maybe you
> can peer-review the patch?
Message-ID: <email address hidden> 1?q?Frank_ K=FCster? = <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:01:01 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-
To: Martin Pitt <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, Martin Pitt <email address hidden>,
Florian Weimer <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?
Martin Pitt <email address hidden> wrote:
> After discovering that the same flawed multiplication is also present
> in upstream's other two patches, I decided to completely rework the
> patch.
>
> I attach the debdiff with separated out changelog. Florian, maybe you
> can peer-review the patch?
Martin and Florian, Joey Schulze also sent a "fixed" patch to the bug, bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 3D342292; msg=3D131
see http://
Would you be so kind and review it?
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer