Comment 51 for bug 26650

Hi Frank, hi Florian!

Frank Küster [2005-12-08 13:17 +0100]:
> Martin Pitt <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm currently preparing Ubuntu security updates for these issues, and
> > I noticed that the upstream provided patch is wrong. I sent the mail
> > below to upstream (and some others).
> >
> > Can you please check that you indeed fixed (tetex-bin)/will fix
> > (poppler) DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF(), too?
> [...]
> > It seems that the patch linked from these advisories [1] is a little
> > bit flawed: it checks numComps twice in DCTStream::readBaselineSOF(),
> > but does not check it in DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF().
>
> We have the same flaw in our upload. Would you be so kind and check the
> updated patch at
>
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-tetex/tetex-bin/trunk/debian/patches/patch-CVE-2005-3191+2+3?op=file&rev=0&sc=0

After discovering that the same flawed multiplication is also present
in upstream's other two patches, I decided to completely rework the
patch.

I attach the debdiff with separated out changelog. Florian, maybe you
can peer-review the patch?

Thanks!

Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org

In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?