Comment 4 for bug 23961

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:43:22 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <email address hidden>
To: Ryan Murray <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#334005: builds libkpathsea3 which is also built by
 libkpathsea3

Ryan Murray <email address hidden> wrote:

> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.0.2-31
> Severity: serious
>
> libkpathsea3 is now built by libkpathsea3 -- tetex-bin needs to be updated
> to not build libkpathsea3 packages anymore.

How grave is this problem for the autobuilders? I plan to upload
tetex-bin_3.0-x to unstable in a couple of days, which would fix this,
anyway. Is it necessary to upload a tetex-bin_2.0.2-32 which has only
the change of not building libkpathsea3(-dev)? Are there any problems
in connection with the libpng problems on powerpc, s390 and perhaps
other arches?

TIA, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer