Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> As recently discovered the patch, which fixed CAN-2004-0888, seems to
> be broken on all 64bit platforms (tested only on ia64 though).[1]
Note that CAN-2005-0206 has been assigned for this issue.
BTW, since you were able to track this one down, do you have any info
about the other packages (cupsys, xpdf, etc) that also has
CAN-2004-0888? Do they also need fixes, and do you have a patch for
them?
--=20
see shy jo
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:14:22 -0500
From: Joey Hess <email address hidden>
To: Hilmar Preusse <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#300182: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> As recently discovered the patch, which fixed CAN-2004-0888, seems to
> be broken on all 64bit platforms (tested only on ia64 though).[1]
Note that CAN-2005-0206 has been assigned for this issue.
BTW, since you were able to track this one down, do you have any info
about the other packages (cupsys, xpdf, etc) that also has
CAN-2004-0888? Do they also need fixes, and do you have a patch for
them?
--=20
see shy jo
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
d8HHehbQuO8RAv8 rAKCV6DDdlNIC0t 7z1tTcnfW/ w6epnQCg229q KujGye1Q=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCO1K+
BrTNMgyXteo7q1F
=cNYr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VbJkn9YxBvnuC H5J--