> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:04:21PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > (which, if you're using from C++ code, you'll
> > have to #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS before you include stdint.h).
>=20
> This name is reserved. It is undefined behaviour if you define it.
So what is the recommended way to do this correctly? And why is my
analysis wrong that INT_MAX is defined in limits.h?
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
Message-ID: <email address hidden> 8859-1? q?Frank_ K=FCster? =)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:52:20 +0100
From: <email address hidden> (=?iso-
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: xpdf vulnerability?
Please please keep the bugnumber in the Cc!
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:04:21PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > (which, if you're using from C++ code, you'll
> > have to #define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS before you include stdint.h).
>=20
> This name is reserved. It is undefined behaviour if you define it.
So what is the recommended way to do this correctly? And why is my
analysis wrong that INT_MAX is defined in limits.h?
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer