Comment 18 for bug 14171

Revision history for this message
In , Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote : Re: Bug#300182: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)

Hi!

Frank Küster [2005-03-22 12:49 +0100]:
> Martin, good to hear that. Did you also read the other messages in this
> thread, namely Hamish's confusion about CAN-2004-0888 vs. CAN-2004-0889?

He is certainly not the only one who is confused about these. All
patches that I ever saw fix both CANs, and the description of both
CANs are nearly identical. I really don't know which particular fix
belongs to which CAN.

> And, by the way, why didn't you answer to the bug, or the security
> list(s)?

Hmm, I replied to <email address hidden> and I can see my
reply at

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=300182

Didn't you get this mail? If not, I shall probably reply to
<email address hidden> in addition, but I thought this would happen
automatically.

Martin

--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org