On 31.12.04 Martin Schulze (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > So why is the hunk then included in the patch for xpdf 1.0 (DSA
> > 619-1)? Why is it part of 3.00pl2 at all?
>
> Because it's the upstream fix and doesn't harm. Contrary to
> tetex-bin this is only a minor part of the correction for cups and
> xpdf. The real vulnerability does not exist in tetex-bin, so
> there's no update needed.
>
Would you be so kind to close that bug then?
On 31.12.04 Martin Schulze (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > So why is the hunk then included in the patch for xpdf 1.0 (DSA
> > 619-1)? Why is it part of 3.00pl2 at all?
>
> Because it's the upstream fix and doesn't harm. Contrary to
> tetex-bin this is only a minor part of the correction for cups and
> xpdf. The real vulnerability does not exist in tetex-bin, so
> there's no update needed.
>
Would you be so kind to close that bug then?
Thanks and Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault