On 30.12.04 Martin Schulze (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > Martin Schulze <email address hidden> schrieb:
> > > Frank Küster wrote:
> > >> Martin Schulze <email address hidden> schrieb:
Hi,
> > >> > I'm attaching the patch we're using for fixing woody.
> > >>
> > >> The patch was empty.
> > >
> > > Uh? How did that happen?
> >
> > Don't know. I would still be interested.
>
> It's basically the same as in this bug report, but it's bogus
> as you correctly pointed out, since the program flow will end
> in the case statement that is able to detect wrong values of
> nComps.
>
So why is the hunk then included in the patch for xpdf 1.0 (DSA
619-1)? Why is it part of 3.00pl2 at all?
On 30.12.04 Martin Schulze (<email address hidden>) wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > Martin Schulze <email address hidden> schrieb:
> > > Frank Küster wrote:
> > >> Martin Schulze <email address hidden> schrieb:
Hi,
> > >> > I'm attaching the patch we're using for fixing woody.
> > >>
> > >> The patch was empty.
> > >
> > > Uh? How did that happen?
> >
> > Don't know. I would still be interested.
>
> It's basically the same as in this bug report, but it's bogus
> as you correctly pointed out, since the program flow will end
> in the case statement that is able to detect wrong values of
> nComps.
>
So why is the hunk then included in the patch for xpdf 1.0 (DSA
619-1)? Why is it part of 3.00pl2 at all?
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault