>> | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
>> | stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
>> | means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
>> | without prior written permission of the publisher.
>
> (from /usr/share/doc/texmf/context/manual/cont-eni.pdf.gz)
>
> This sounds bad, indeed. However, I think that the ConTeXt manual is
> actually covered by the general ConTeXt license in
> /usr/share/doc/texmf/context/base/mreadme.pdf.gz and
> /usr/share/doc/texmf/context/base/LICENSE.teTeX, which is free.
But we lack the ConTeXt source code for those PDFs, do we? This means
it still has to go into non-free.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 22:37:07 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <email address hidden>
To: Ralf Stubner <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#345604: ConTeXt documentation is non-free
* Ralf Stubner:
>> | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, doc/texmf/ context/ manual/ cont-eni. pdf.gz) doc/texmf/ context/ base/mreadme. pdf.gz and doc/texmf/ context/ base/LICENSE. teTeX, which is free.
>> | stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
>> | means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
>> | without prior written permission of the publisher.
>
> (from /usr/share/
>
> This sounds bad, indeed. However, I think that the ConTeXt manual is
> actually covered by the general ConTeXt license in
> /usr/share/
> /usr/share/
But we lack the ConTeXt source code for those PDFs, do we? This means
it still has to go into non-free.