Comment 50 for bug 27858

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 13:53 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <email address hidden> wrote:
> > Most of the work on tetex-doc-nonfree was done before the GR on GFDL. At
> > that time, it seemed pretty clear that any GFDL licensed document would
> > have to go to non-free. Most of the discussion is in #345604. After the
> > unexpected outcome of the GR, I am not sure if we should jump to
> > conclusions already and move the files back.
>
> What else do you suggest? Do you expect any statement (e.g. by
> ftp-master) with respect to "GFDL/Debian free" documents?
>
> Technically speaking, I don't think there's a good reason to keep them
> out of tetex-doc (and they are still in the tetex-base tarball, which is
> not yet repackaged).

I would have suggested to wait a bit until the dust has settled. ;-) But
I don't claim to understand the inner workings of Debian in all details.
I am not opposing moving back GFDL/Debian free docs.

cheerio
ralf