Comment 46 for bug 27858

Ralf Stubner <email address hidden> wrote:

> Hi Norbert, hi all,
>
> Most of the work on tetex-doc-nonfree was done before the GR on GFDL. At
> that time, it seemed pretty clear that any GFDL licensed document would
> have to go to non-free. Most of the discussion is in #345604. After the
> unexpected outcome of the GR, I am not sure if we should jump to
> conclusions already and move the files back.

What else do you suggest? Do you expect any statement (e.g. by
ftp-master) with respect to "GFDL/Debian free" documents?

Technically speaking, I don't think there's a good reason to keep them
out of tetex-doc (and they are still in the tetex-base tarball, which is
not yet repackaged).

Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)