I'm not sure I saw anybody announce that evolution-sharp is dead. Having no updates in one year is not uncommon in the open source world. I'm not sure I agree with this statement from the Debian bug: "It's completely broken with no signs of life upstream".
If by "completely broken" you mean that the Debian/Ubuntu packages are broken, then you're correct. If you mean the actual software is completely broken, then that's a pretty vague statement that I'm not sure I understand.
It's going to be funny when we start bundling evolution-sharp in Tasque and you guys complain that we should instead be depending on an evolution-sharp package.
I'm not sure I saw anybody announce that evolution-sharp is dead. Having no updates in one year is not uncommon in the open source world. I'm not sure I agree with this statement from the Debian bug: "It's completely broken with no signs of life upstream".
If by "completely broken" you mean that the Debian/Ubuntu packages are broken, then you're correct. If you mean the actual software is completely broken, then that's a pretty vague statement that I'm not sure I understand.
It's going to be funny when we start bundling evolution-sharp in Tasque and you guys complain that we should instead be depending on an evolution-sharp package.