Comment 3 for bug 1908140

Revision history for this message
Ryan (ryanf-rowe) wrote :

> your bonded links are down; nothing will happen until they are brought up.

Yes, I figured as such. I've already tried to bring up eth0, eth1, and bond0 via ip, ifup, and ifconfig to no success.

> your pasted log appears incomplete since i see no output for eth0 or eth1; please paste or attach your entire log.

This is the entire log since reboot. If I look at the journal from previous boots, there are mentions of eth0 and eth1, as well as eno1 and eno2.

$ networkctl list
IDX LINK TYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP
  1 lo loopback carrier unmanaged
  2 eno1 ether off unmanaged
  3 eno2 ether off unmanaged
  4 eth0 ether off pending
  5 eth1 ether off pending
  6 bond0 bond no-carrier configured
  7 docker0 bridge no-carrier unmanaged

After doing ip link set dev {eth0,eth1} up, they change from off to degraded in networkctl list. Attempting the same on bond0 afterward does nothing.

$ networkctl status -n 40
* State: no carrier
  Address: 172.17.0.1 on docker0
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: Enumeration completed.
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
Dec 14 21:31:44 lore systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Dec 14 21:31:44 lore systemd[1]: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Dec 14 21:31:44 lore systemd[1]: Failed to start Wait for Network to be Configured.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link '7' we don't know about, ignoring.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link '7' we don't know about, ignoring.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link '7' we don't know about, ignoring.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: rtn1: received neighbor for link '7' we don't know about, ignoring.
Dec 14 21:31:50 lore systemd-networkd[852]: docker0: Link UP
Dec 15 18:13:43 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Link IP
Dec 15 18:13:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Ganied carrier
Dec 15 18:13:47 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Gained IPv6LL
Dec 15 18:13:47 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Ganied carrier
Dec 15 18:13:48 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Gained IPv6LL
Dec 15 18:15:13 lore systemd-networkd[856]: bond0: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:41 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:41 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Lost carrier
Dec 15 18:15:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Lost carrer

All of the lines from today (Dec 15) correspond to my attempts to bring interfaces up as mentioned above, then bringing them back down after it failed.

> networkctl status bond0 eth0 eth1
* 4: eth0
             Link File: n/a
          Network File: n/a
                Status: off (pending)
            HW Address: 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 (Super Micro Computer, Inc.)
                   MTU: 1500 (min: 68, max: 9710)
  Queue Length (Tx/Rx): 64/64
     Auto negotiaition: yes
                 Speed: n/a
                  Port: tp

Dec 14 21:29:42 lore systemd-udevd[588]: eth0: Failed to rename network interface 4 from 'eth0' to 'eno1': File exists
Dec 14 21:29:42 lore systemd-udevd[588]: eth0: Failed to process device, ignoring: File exists
Dec 15 18:13:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Ganied carrier
Dec 15 18:13:47 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Gained IPv6LL
Dec 15 18:15:41 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:41 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth0: Lost carrier

* 5: eth1
             Link File: n/a
          Network File: n/a
                Status: off (pending)
            HW Address: 0c:c4:7a:c6:c6:a2 (Super Micro Computer, Inc.)
                   MTU: 1500 (min: 68, max: 9710)
  Queue Length (Tx/Rx): 64/64
     Auto negotiaition: yes
                 Speed: n/a
                  Port: tp

Dec 14 21:29:42 lore systemd-udevd[588]: eth1: Failed to rename network interface 5 from 'eth1' to 'eno2': File exists
Dec 14 21:29:42 lore systemd-udevd[588]: eth1: Failed to process device, ignoring: File exists
Dec 15 18:13:43 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Link IP
Dec 15 18:13:47 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Ganied carrier
Dec 15 18:13:48 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Gained IPv6LL
Dec 15 18:15:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Link DOWN
Dec 15 18:15:45 lore systemd-networkd[856]: eth1: Lost carrer

* 6: bond0
             Link File: /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link
          Network File: /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-bond0.network
                  Type: bond
                 State: off (configured)
                Driver: bonding
            HW Address: 52:8b:2c:cc:a0:15
                   MTU: 1500 (min: 68, max: 65535)
  Queue Length (Tx/Rx): 16/16
      Auto negotiation: no
                 Speed: n/a

Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: netdev ready
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: IPv6 successfully enabled
Dec 14 21:29:44 lore systemd-networkd[852]: bond0: Link UP
Dec 15 18:15:13 lore systemd-networkd[856]: bond0: Link DOWN

It seems there's a naming conflict between the eth and eno devices. udevadm test-builtin net_id ... shows both enp3sf0 and enp5s0f0 should be eno1 and enp3sf1 and enp5s0f1 should be eno2