Comment 7 for bug 1843755

@vorlon: Those regressions are found in 243 RC1, I'm now preparing 243 final which has new regressions compared to 243 RC1. Many regressions introduced in 243 were reported to upstream and got fixed in 243 final, but not all of them.

There were two regression identified in 242 (regressing network-manager and netplan.io) and I made a minimal revert in 242-6ubuntu1 to avoid those. So regression-wise 242 seems to be clean as far as we can tell and I believe regressions introduced at upstream between v242 and v243 are not a factor in deciding on accepting 242, unless you propose going right to v243, but I would advise against that as it is not ready.