From systemd point of view, the patches are relatively straight forward, and simply add "one more way to sleep/suspend/hybernate/etc" without affecting any other code paths or any other functionality. Thus i see little risk for landing the systemd patches.
If this turns out to be bad, only the policy would need to be change to either not offer it by default, or not use by default. Or some such.
From systemd point of view, the patches are relatively straight forward, and simply add "one more way to sleep/suspend/ hybernate/ etc" without affecting any other code paths or any other functionality. Thus i see little risk for landing the systemd patches.
If this turns out to be bad, only the policy would need to be change to either not offer it by default, or not use by default. Or some such.